How you can measure worker productivity within the IT industry

1.7K

Wish to learn the way to measure worker productivity within the IT industry?

It’s no secret that measuring worker productivity is one among the toughest things to do nowadays. As there are such a lot of variables to maintain track of, determining how well an worker is performing generally is a very confusing process for many businesses.

And while you’re coping with the IT sector, this may turn out to be much more difficult!

But don’t worry.

In this text, we’ll first go over why traditional productivity tracking is flawed – especially with regards to the IT industry. We’ll then go over just a few different approaches to accurately measure worker productivity within the IT industry. 

Table of Contents

Let’s start.

Why do it’s worthwhile to measure worker productivity?

Before we go into why traditional productivity monitoring is flawed and the ways to resolve it, let’s first cover why it’s worthwhile to track worker productivity in the primary place:

• Discover strengths and weaknesses: By assessing productivity, you’ll be able to discover high-performing employees and areas where individuals or teams excel. This information helps in recognizing strengths and areas that need improvement.
• Optimize resource allocation: Understanding productivity levels enables higher allocation of resources. You may be certain that the appropriate amount of workforce is allocated to tasks and projects, avoiding underutilization or overburdening.
• Enhance performance: Productivity measurement provides data that could be used to implement performance improvement strategies. This will include training programs, process improvements, or providing additional support where needed.
• Set and achieve goals: Clear productivity metrics assist in setting realistic and achievable goals. It allows for tracking progress towards these goals and making vital adjustments to remain heading in the right direction.
• Boost worker morale: Recognizing and rewarding productive employees can boost morale and motivation. Employees who see their efforts acknowledged usually tend to stay engaged and committed.
• Improve decision-making: Data-driven insights from productivity measurements assist managers in making informed decisions regarding hiring, promotions, and workflow adjustments.
• Increase efficiency: Identifying inefficiencies through productivity evaluation allows for process optimization, reducing wasted time and resources, and improving overall efficiency.
• Ensure fair compensation: Productivity data can assist in determining fair compensation and rewards. It ensures that employees are compensated based on their contributions and performance.
• Monitor distant work: With the rise of distant work, measuring productivity becomes essential to be certain that employees are maintaining their performance levels outside the normal office environment.
• Drive business growth: Ultimately, high productivity contributes to the general growth and success of the business. It results in increased output, higher customer satisfaction, and better profitability.

By measuring worker productivity, organizations can create a more practical, efficient, and motivated workforce, resulting in sustained business success.

Why traditional productivity monitoring is flawed

One among the the explanation why productivity tracking is so difficult for many businesses is that they take the incorrect approach to it.

Generally, people take a look at workforce productivity through this productivity formula:

Here, productivity is seen as a measure of the ratio of how much was produced (worker output) over a set time period and energy (input). 

Here’s why this can be a problem when measuring productivity:

1. It doesn’t deal with quality

Traditional productivity measurement only focuses on the quantity of output an worker churns out. It doesn’t measure the quality of that output.

This is very problematic within the IT service industry as when your IT team is responding to tickets, they need to resolve them accurately to really satisfy the shoppers. 

Your team could theoretically breeze through all their IT support requests without really solving any issues. By traditional performance measurement, they might be super-productive as they covered tons of tickets and their total output is high. 

Nonetheless, as they aren’t providing top quality service and haven’t actually solved anything, they shouldn’t be seen as productive in any respect!  

2. It doesn’t take the variety of task under consideration

That is one other key issue with traditional productivity tracking.

When measuring efficiency purely based on output, you assume that each one tasks were of equal difficulty and equal importance.

Nonetheless, everyone knows that that isn’t true.

Here’s an example to point out you what we mean:

Let’s say you could have two IT professionals – X & Y.

X is in control of responding to service requests and Y is in control of website maintenance.

Responding to an easy IT service request might be not as essential or as difficult as redoing your website’s security infrastructure. 

Nonetheless, as X can answer numerous calls and solve tons of service requests within the variety of hours it takes Y to redo your security infrastructure, they’ll routinely be seen as having higher productivity than Y. 

Doesn’t seem fair, right?

3. It doesn’t take a look at intangibles

One other issue with traditional productivity monitoring is that it only monitors tangible outputs – omitting the assorted intangibles that employees are involved with day-after-day.

What are these intangibles?

While there are a whole lot of intangibles on the market, listed here are just a few common ones:

• Worker engagement
• Teamwork
• Compassion
• Dedication
• Respect
• Gratitude

Why are they essential?

While they might in a roundabout way connect with an worker’s output, these intangibles play an enormous role in measuring productivity at your organization. That’s why failing to account for these can result in a severely flawed productivity measurement system at the person level.

For instance, let’s say one among your IT support members is great at coping with customer complaints. Nonetheless, they’re not a team player and alienate the opposite team members within the work environment. In accordance with traditional performance measurement, you’ll be able to’t fault them as their output is great.

Nonetheless, as they’re horrible at teamwork and their engagement level is poor, the remainder of your team may very well be suffering – resulting in diminished business and team productivity overall.

How you can measure worker productivity within the IT industry accurately

Now that why traditional productivity measurement is flawed, let’s get into how you’ll be able to accurately measure the productivity of your IT staff:

1. Measure worker performance metrics

Among the finest ways to measure productivity is through the use of KPIs (key performance indicators) as a performance metric.

What’s a KPI?

They’re performance measurements over various activities that you could use to find out how well your employees are doing. 

For instance, “no. of sales closed” is a very good performance metric for a salesman. This fashion, while you’re evaluating their productivity, you’ll be able to take a look at this KPI to find out their productivity levels.

As these worker performance metrics are hard data, it takes among the subjectivity out of performance measurement to be certain that things remain accurate. Also, sometimes a performance metric can test for each quantity and quality of output along with taking the type of task under consideration.

Moreover, as employees are made aware of what performance metrics they’ll be judged on, they will focus their efforts on ensuring that they get the perfect results. This takes away numerous the anomaly that’s often related to productivity measurement.

Nonetheless, it’s essential to do not forget that while metrics bring numerous transparency to the measurement process, it’s hard to measure intangibles with them. That’s one among the the explanation why worker performance metrics should just be an element of your productivity evaluation process.

Listed here are some performance metrics that you could use to measure your labor productivity:

A. Actual IT spend vs planned

That is a very good metric to check what you expected to spend in your IT department vs. what was actually spent over a time period. It’s a very good measure of the cost-effectiveness of your entire IT department – helping you higher determine workforce productivity.

B. Average spend per IT worker

This productivity metric divides the overall expenditure in your IT department by the variety of employees you could have. It’s an estimate of how much money you place into each worker. 

Generally, the lower you could have to spend per worker, the simpler it’s to take care of higher productivity and better worker efficiency.

C. Average revenue per worker

This metric divides the overall revenue you generate out of your IT department by the variety of IT team members employed. Use this figure as a benchmark when the following individual productivity and performance metric:

D. Actual revenue generated

Have a look at each worker individually and calculate the revenue they create in over a timeframe. Then, compare it with the common revenue per worker to find out their productivity level in comparison to other team members.

E. Variety of projects on time

This metric calculates the variety of tasks and projects each worker submitted/handled on time. A better rating here normally indicates high individual productivity.

F. Customer satisfaction rating (CSAT)

That is an incredible metric to judge the standard of the output of your IT customer support representatives. Here, you calculate the common customer satisfaction scores for every worker to find out an worker’s ability in keeping with the shoppers. 

In case your organization uses a performance rating system, you should use that as a substitute.

G. Average speed to reply

This metric measures how quickly your IT support staff responds to a customer request. A low average speed to reply indicates proactive project management.

2. Use self-assessments and peer reviews

Self-assessments and peer reviews are a few of the perfect ways to measure all of the elements that performance metrics and KPIs can’t measure. Naturally, that makes it probably the greatest ways to measure all of the intangibles that go into accurate productivity measurement.

A. Self-assessments

Here, employees are asked to evaluate their performance themselves. This is useful as no person is best placed to judge their capabilities than themselves.

Here, you ask them to check how productive they feel they could be against how productive they really were in various departments like teamwork, time-management, etc. 

Because the employee is setting goal productivity gains they’re able to themselves, they’re setting achievable individual productivity goals to pursue in the long run. 

And when these individual goals relate to your organization goals, you’ll have the ability to directly link individual performance to a greater bottom line!

B. Peer performance review

Since many intangibles like teamwork and empathy are closely tied to how employees interact with one another, asking an worker’s peers for insights into their overall productivity is smart.

Moreover, as they work alongside them day-after-day, their peers will likely be in a a lot better position to accurately evaluate an worker’s productivity. 

In spite of everything, who do you’re thinking that has a greater picture of somebody’s intangibles – a manager who only closely monitors a employee once a month, or their coworkers who spend eight hours with them on a regular basis? 

Nonetheless, as distant employees don’t interact with their peers as much as an in-house team does, distant peer evaluations is probably not as detailed. One other problem with peer reviews is that the measurement could be highly subjective and every worker’s biases can easily creep into their evaluations

It’s one among the the explanation why you shouldn’t depend on just one peer performance review to find out how someone is doing. Have a look at reviews from all their peers as a complete to get a “general” idea of worker performance.

Then, couple these general observations with the productivity data you collected via your metrics to create holistic productivity measures for your enterprise.

The best strategy to keep your employees productive

Sure, measuring employee performance is essential, but just measuring productivity isn’t enough.

You would like a strategy to actually keep employees productive too, right?

That’s where time tracking and productivity tracking software is available in.

These tools will provide help to:

• Keep your employees focused and achieve higher productivity on their job
• Deter them from wasting their work time
• Gain priceless, every day updates into workforce productivity

With this productivity software, you’ll have the ability to:

• Be certain that your IT staff is actively working during their work day – even when engaged in distant work.
• Use insightful, real-time reports to investigate the general productivity of every IT team member.
• Be sure that your IT staff is spending time on the right web sites and right apps.
• Track their productivity across various platforms, like ClickUp and Zendesk.
• Accurately track employee hours and pay them for the time put in. 
• Track employee productivity from anywhere using the Android app.

Wrapping up

While measuring the worker productivity within the IT industry can seem daunting, it doesn’t need to be.

When you recognize the failings related to traditional productivity monitoring and implement more practical measures, you’ll haven’t any difficulty getting accurate insights into your IT team’s productivity.

Use the metrics and techniques we mentioned here to create a productivity measurement strategy that’s each accurate and employee-friendly.